Poor SQL
7.3#1 in sql linters and formattersFree planFree planWebAPIExtensionLinux
VisitPoor SQL vs SQLFluff
What both publish
| Fact | Poor SQL | SQLFluff |
|---|---|---|
| Dialect support | The project is focused on Microsoft T-SQL; support for other SQL dialects is possible but none is implemented as a dedicated dialect. | The documentation says SQLFluff supports more than 25 SQL dialects, including T-SQL, PostgreSQL, BigQuery, and Snowflake. |
| Integrations | Downloads include plugins for SQL Server Management Studio, Visual Studio, and WinMerge. | SQLFluff can be used in CI/CD pipelines and supports GitHub Actions output for pull request annotations. |
Poor SQL plans
- FreeFree
SQLFluff plans
- SQLFluffFree
Pick Poor SQL if…
Poor SQL suits T-SQL users who want configurable formatting, browser-based offline use, or integrations with listed editors and tools. It may also fit developers who want to use its open-source library in .NET, Mono, JavaScript, or Node.js contexts.
Pick SQLFluff if…
SQLFluff suits teams that want to check SQL style and syntax across multiple dialects, including in ELT and CI/CD workflows. It may fit users working with Jinja templates or dbt who can meet the additional dbt requirements.