Picus Security Platform vs Skyhawk Security BAS
Picus Security Platform
6.5 #4 in Breach and Attack Simulation Software
About Picus Security Platform| Picus Security Platform | Skyhawk Security BAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | api, Web |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Attack simulation modes | hybrid | agentless |
| Included attack surfaces | network, endpoint, email, web application, data exfiltration, URL filtering | cloud architecture, cloud security controls, identities and permissions, vulnerabilities, attack paths, high-value cloud assets |
| MITRE ATT&CK mapping | Yes | Yes |
| Custom attack scenarios | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | hybrid | cloud |
Both are listed in Best Breach and Attack Simulation Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Picus Security Platform scores higher on our published basis.