EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Pentesterra vs w3af

Pentesterra

7.7#1 in penetration testing softwareFrom €23 a month
Free planWebAPIExtensionLinux
Visit

w3af

6.8#5 in penetration testing softwareFree plan
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit

What both publish

FactPentesterraw3af
DeploymentThe platform is deployable as SaaS, dedicated PaaS, or fully air-gapped on-premises.The installation guide documents running w3af in Docker and provides installation instructions for Mac OS X.
IntegrationsPublished integrations include Jira ticket creation, ServiceNow, SIEM CEF/JSON export, SAML/OIDC SSO and CI/CD workflows.The documentation describes Metasploit integration and suggests sending vulnerabilities to an internal issue tracker through its REST API.
SupportThe licensing matrix lists 24x7 support for VM, ANPT, BAS, Web pentesting, MSSP and GOV tiers.For installation issues, the guide directs users to create a ticket and include their Linux distribution, dependency-install script, pip freeze output, and Python version.

Pentesterra plans

  • DevGuard FreeFree
  • Vibe Coding€23 a month
  • Vibe Coding Pro€75 a month
  • Small Team€299 a month
  • Team (SMB)€1,299 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

w3af plans

  • w3afFree

Pick Pentesterra if…

Pentesterra is aimed at internal security teams, MSSPs, and organizations in regulated environments. Its deployment choices and mix of web, network, vulnerability, and attack-simulation workflows may suit teams seeking to orchestrate those activities in one platform.

Pick w3af if…

w3af is suited to developers and penetration testers conducting web application vulnerability assessments. It is also relevant to teams seeking a scanner they can automate through scripts or a REST API.

Charts they share