OBE Legal Intake Software
7.4#3 in legal workflow automation softwareFrom $1,400 a monthAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitOBE Legal Intake Software vs Scalata
What both publish
| Fact | OBE Legal Intake Software | Scalata |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Published integrations include two-way synchronization with Clio, Filevine, and Lead Docket, plus Retell AI voice services. | The maker lists connectors including Gmail, Outlook, Google Drive, Microsoft 365, Slack, Salesforce, Jira, HubSpot, Snowflake, PostgreSQL, Amazon S3, and Azure Blob Storage. |
| Intended users | OBE describes its intended customers as plaintiff-side law firms, contingency practices, consumer litigators, and high-volume mass-arbitration teams. | The maker says it serves hedge funds, banks, private-credit funds, servicers, trustees, and asset holders. |
| Support | Support is described through encrypted Slack or Teams channels, sub-15-minute critical alerts, same-day calibrations, and engineering fixes. | The enterprise page describes built-in support and directs prospective customers to contact sales or book a demo. |
OBE Legal Intake Software plans
- Managed OBE$1,400 a month
- Fractional Overflow & After-Hours Pod$1,450 a month
- Polanco Dedicated Intake Pod$2,450 a month
- SaaS Platform License$2,499 a month
- Repository Ownership (legacy pricing page)$14,900, paid once
- Single Practice License$29,000, paid once
Scalata plans
- FreeFree
- Pro$20 a month
- Max$100 a month
Pick OBE Legal Intake Software if…
It is intended for plaintiff-side law firms, contingency practices, consumer litigators, and high-volume mass-arbitration teams. It may suit firms seeking configurable intake and document review workflows, while preserving lawyer oversight.
Pick Scalata if…
Scalata may suit financial and other regulated organizations, including hedge funds, banks, private-credit funds, servicers, trustees, and asset holders. Its described tools also suit teams that need data-connected analysis and controlled workflows.