EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Noplag vs Proofademic

Noplag logo

Noplag

8.3#1 in plagiarism checkersFrom $9.99 a month
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit

Proofademic

6.8#12 in ai plagiarism checkersFrom $15 a month
Free planWebAPI
Visit

What both publish

FactNoplagProofademic
AudienceThe pricing page positions Pro for makers and small teams, Premium for agencies and publishers, and Enterprise for universities and regulated organizations.Proofademic describes its intended users as educators, students, institutions, publishers, and enterprise teams.
HeadquartersSan Francisco, United States447 Broadway, 2nd Floor, New York, NY 10013
IntegrationsThe features page lists Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, and Brightspace integrations via LTI 1.3.The privacy policy says Proofademic requests Google Docs access to analyze a document the user explicitly selects; the homepage says LMS integrations are planned.
LanguagesDetection is calibrated at launch for English, Spanish, Portuguese, Polish, and Ukrainian.Proofademic says it supports review of essays, research papers, articles, and reports in 23 languages.
ProductNoplag is an open-source plagiarism checker with a hosted cloud service and an engine released under Apache 2.0.Proofademic analyzes submitted writing for AI-generated content and plagiarism, with reports that include an overall score and sentence-by-sentence breakdown.

Noplag plans

  • FreeFree
  • Pro$9.99 a month
  • Premium$19.99 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Proofademic plans

  • FreeFree
  • Essential$15 a month
  • Premium$25 a month
  • Professional$45 a month

Pick Noplag if…

Noplag may suit people checking documents for verbatim or near-verbatim overlap, including makers, small teams, agencies, publishers, and educational organizations. The listed plans range from a three-check monthly free tier to custom Enterprise arrangements.

Pick Proofademic if…

Proofademic may suit educators, students, publishers, institutions, and enterprise teams reviewing written work. Batch Scan is geared toward teams handling multiple documents.

Charts they share