EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Nitrokey 3 vs Solo 2

Solo 2

6.7#3 in security keys$34 one-time
AndroidiOSWebLinux
Visit

What both publish

FactNitrokey 3Solo 2
AuthenticationNitrokey 3 supports two-factor and passwordless authentication using a PIN and physical button touch.It supports FIDO2, WebAuthn, and U2F; basic use requires no software installation or drivers.
HeadquartersTeltow, near Berlin, GermanyNewark, Delaware, United States
IntegrationsNitrokey documentation provides FIDO2 guides for Nextcloud, Microsoft login, Android, SSH, and Entra ID provisioning.It works with security-key-enabled services including Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Salesforce, GitHub, Dropbox, and Twitter/X.
Open sourceNitrokey says its hardware and software are open source, allowing independent security reviews.The maker says Solo 2 is fully open source: software is dual licensed under Apache 2.0 and MIT, hardware under CERN-OHL-S, and documentation under CC-BY-SA 4.0.
SupportNitrokey says it offers free email support in German, English, and French, along with product guides in its documentation.For help with a purchased device, SoloKeys directs customers to its support email or contact form.

Nitrokey 3 plans

  • Nitrokey 3A Mini€54, paid once
  • Nitrokey 3A NFC€60, paid once
  • Nitrokey 3C NFC€65, paid once

Solo 2 plans

  • Solo 2C Security Key$34, paid once
  • Solo 2 USB-A Hacker$35, paid once
  • Solo 2 USB-A Security Key$35, paid once
  • Solo 2A+ NFC Security Key$46, paid once
  • Solo 2C+ NFC Security Key$46, paid once

Pick Nitrokey 3 if…

Nitrokey 3 suits people who want a physical key for FIDO2/U2F login, cryptographic key storage, or password management. It may also suit business users needing PIV smartcard functionality.

Pick Solo 2 if…

Solo 2 is presented for everyday users, security professionals, and enterprise teams who want a physical key for account authentication. Its Hacker model is aimed at developers, security researchers, and makers.

Charts they share