Nijam vs ReportPortal
| Nijam | ReportPortal | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | $569/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | 20 /mo | 569 /mo |
| Supported frameworks | Playwright, pytest, Vitest | TestNG, JBehave, Pytest, Robot Framework, Playwright, Postman, NUnit, VSTest, SpecFlow, xUnit, Reqnroll, Cypress, CucumberJS, CodeceptJS, WebdriverIO, Mocha, Jest, Vitest, Nightwatch, Jasmine, TestCafe |
| CI/CD integrations | GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure Pipelines | Azure DevOps, Bitrise CI/CD, CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins |
| Flaky-test detection | Yes | Yes |
| Failure analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Execution trend reports | Yes | Yes |
| Data retention | 90 days | — |
| Self-hosted deployment | No | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Test Analytics Software. On Everything Xiaomi, ReportPortal scores higher on our published basis.