NanoMQ vs Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer
Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer
6.6 #13 in Message Broker Software
About Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer| NanoMQ | Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, Linux | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Deployment model | self_hosted | self_hosted |
| Delivery guarantees | configurable | — |
| Supported protocols | MQTT, ZeroMQ, nanomsg, NNG, WebSocket, SOME/IP, DDS, MQTT over QUIC | Core Protocol, AMQP 1.0, MQTT, OpenWire, STOMP, JMS 2.0 |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Dead-letter queues | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Message Broker Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer scores higher on our published basis.