muxterm
6.3#8 in terminal multiplexersFree planFree planWebLinuxmacOSWindows
Visitmuxterm vs RMUX
What both publish
| Fact | muxterm | RMUX |
|---|---|---|
| License | The repository identifies the project as MIT licensed. | RMUX is dual-licensed under MIT or Apache License 2.0. |
| Platforms | The README provides macOS Homebrew and Linux installation instructions, says Windows Scoop support is coming soon, and says binaries are attached to GitHub releases. | RMUX documents native support for Windows, macOS, and Linux; Windows uses ConPTY and named pipes, while macOS and Linux use Unix PTYs and Unix-domain sockets. |
muxterm plans
- muxtermFree
RMUX plans
- RMUXFree
Pick muxterm if…
Muxterm suits people who want persistent terminal sessions managed through a browser interface, including users working with MCP-compatible agents. Its self-hosted setup may appeal to those comfortable running a single binary.
Pick RMUX if…
RMUX suits developers who want persistent local terminal sessions or programmatic control through an SDK. Its browser sharing and access roles may also suit people who need to share a pane or session with others.