Moara
7.3#9 in ai literature review softwareFrom $15 a monthFree planWebAPI
VisitMoara vs Rayyan
What both publish
| Fact | Moara | Rayyan |
|---|---|---|
| Audience | Moara says it serves academics, graduate students, librarians, research administrators, individual researchers, and library teams. | Rayyan describes its intended organization users as pharma, medical-device, CRO, university, healthcare, government, and health technology assessment teams. |
| Integrations | Named integrations include Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, Zotero, LibKey and Crossref. | Rayyan accepts exported reference files from external databases and reference managers; it says there is no direct database connection. |
| Security | Moara states that data is protected with AES-256 encrypted storage, TLS 1.2 or higher in transit, internal access controls, and role-based permissions. | Rayyan's enterprise page states HIPAA and GDPR compliance, SOC 2 controls, encryption in transit and at rest, and support for SAML 2.0, OAuth, and MFA. |
| Support | The product directs users to in-product help icons and support by email at [email protected]. | The pricing page lists Standard support for Free and Essential, priority support for Advanced and Business / Academic, and dedicated support for Enterprise. |
Moara plans
- FreeFree
- Core$15 a month
- Pro$40 a month
- Teams & InstitutionsPriced on request
Rayyan plans
- FreeFree
- Essential$4.99 a month
- Advanced$8.33 a month
- Business / Academic$41.67 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Moara if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.
Pick Rayyan if…
It suits research teams screening and analysing evidence across a systematic review workflow. The intended organisation users include pharma, medical-device, CRO, university, healthcare, government, and health technology assessment teams.