LucidLink
7.1#3 in distributed file system softwareFrom $7 a monthAndroidiOSWebExtension
VisitLucidLink vs OpenAFS
OpenAFS
6.1#14 in distributed file system softwareFree planFree planLinuxmacOSSelf-hostedWindows
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | LucidLink | OpenAFS |
|---|---|---|
| Access controls | Security features include SAML 2.0 SSO, SCIM provisioning, folder-level read-only or read-write permissions, and real-time access enforcement. | Directory access control lists specify which users or groups can access files and what permissions they have. |
| Security | LucidLink says files are encrypted end to end using AES-256 and that customers control the keys under its zero-knowledge model. | AFS clients and servers mutually authenticate, and server processes encrypt particularly sensitive information sent to clients. |
| Support | The pricing page lists Slack community support for Starter, Standard support for Business, and Premium 24/7 support for Enterprise. | The project wiki points users to mailing lists, an IRC channel, and a page listing individuals and companies offering support or consulting. |
LucidLink plans
- Starter$7 a month
- Business—
- EnterprisePriced on request
OpenAFS plans
- OpenAFSFree
Pick LucidLink if…
LucidLink suits teams collaborating on large files, including people using supported creative and design tools. Its plans specify member and storage limits, so teams should check those against their needs.
Pick OpenAFS if…
It suits organizations such as companies or university departments that need shared network files across a defined user group. It is intended for administrators able to manage AFS volumes and their quotas.