Loadster Synthetic Monitoring
7.8#2 in performance testing softwareFrom $29 a monthFree planWebAPIExtensionLinux
VisitLoadster Synthetic Monitoring vs Locust
What both publish
| Fact | Loadster Synthetic Monitoring | Locust |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Documented integrations include Slack, PagerDuty, Opsgenie and VictorOps (Splunk On-Call). | Optional OpenTelemetry support exports traces, metrics, and logs to compatible backends, including OTLP, Prometheus, Jaeger, and Tempo. |
Loadster Synthetic Monitoring plans
- Free account starter fuelFree
- Monitoring Plans$29 a month
- Monthly Fuel 1K$77 a month
- 1K Monthly Fuel Plan$77 a month
- Pay-As-You-Go Fuel 1K$97, paid once
- Pay-As-You-Go Fuel — 1,000 units$97, paid once
Locust plans
- LocustFree
Pick Loadster Synthetic Monitoring if…
Loadster suits teams that want scheduled checks and alerting for websites, web apps, or APIs. Self-hosted monitoring may suit sites that are not publicly accessible or need checks from a specific location.
Pick Locust if…
Locust suits teams that want to write load-test scenarios in Python and monitor results while tests run. Its distributed execution and protocol extensions may suit testing across multiple machines or systems.