EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Laurel vs LeanLaw

Laurel

6.6#12 in legal time tracking software
AndroidiOSWebAPI
Visit
LeanLaw logo

LeanLaw

7.9#1 in trust accounting softwareFrom $55 a month
AndroidiOSWebAPI
Visit

What both publish

FactLaurelLeanLaw
APILaurel provides API credentials using OAuth 2.0 client credentials, with read-only and read/write permissions.LeanLaw offers a public REST API supporting programmatic reads and writes for clients, matters, time entries, expenses, invoices, users and LEDES codes.
Documentation and supportLaurel maintains a searchable Help Center, technical implementation guides and in-app support messaging.The knowledge base covers setup, clients, time, expenses, billing, payments, trust accounting, reporting, administration, integrations and API topics.
HeadquartersSan Francisco, California, United StatesBoise, Idaho, United States
IntegrationsLaurel lists Microsoft Teams, Zoom, and Webex for capture, and supports practice management connections including Aderant, Elite Enterprise, Elite 3E, Prolaw, and Practice Engine.LeanLaw describes its NetDocuments integration as syncing client and matter data, and its integrations page also names Confido Legal and Billables.ai.
Mobile limitationMobile does not capture activity performed on the phone; activity capture occurs on desktop.The mobile app allows matter viewing but currently does not allow creating or editing matters.

Laurel plans

  • LaurelPriced on request

LeanLaw plans

  • Core$55 a month
  • Pro$75 a month
  • ContingencyPriced on request
  • ElitePriced on request

Pick Laurel if…

Laurel suits legal, accounting, and consulting teams that need activity capture, time entry, and billing review. Mobile users can record work by voice or use a lock-screen timer.

Pick LeanLaw if…

LeanLaw suits modern, mid-sized law firms seeking connected financial workflows, particularly firms that need trust accounting alongside billing. It requires QuickBooks Online.

Charts they share