LAAVAT PKI and Signing Platform vs Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer
LAAVAT PKI and Signing Platform
6.8 #13 in Code Signing Software
About LAAVAT PKI and Signing PlatformRed Hat Trusted Artifact Signer
7.9 #7 in Code Signing Software
About Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer| LAAVAT PKI and Signing Platform | Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Supported targets | NXP HAB/AHAB, AMD/Xilinx Bootgen, TI, MCUboot, FIT, RAUC, SWUpdate, Mender, OP-TEE, OCI/Cosign, Windows, Java, JWT, detached signatures | container images, binaries, documents, source-code commits, software bills of materials, build artifacts, AI/ML models |
| Certificate provided | Yes | Yes |
| Cloud signing | Yes | — |
| HSM key protection | Yes | — |
| Trusted timestamping | Yes | Yes |
| CI/CD signing | Yes | Yes |
| Approval workflows | Yes | — |
Both are listed in Best Code Signing Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Red Hat Trusted Artifact Signer scores higher on our published basis.