EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Kloudlite vs Koding

Kloudlite logo

Kloudlite

8.1#3 in cloud development environmentsFrom $29 a month
Free planWebAPIExtensionLinux
Visit

Koding

6.0#22 in cloud development environments
WebLinuxmacOSSelf-hosted
Visit

What both publish

FactKloudliteKoding
Cloud providersThe BYOC installation flow lets users choose AWS, GCP, or Azure and select a deployment region.The features page lists AWS, DigitalOcean, OpenStack, Vagrant, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Docker, SoftLayer, and Mesosphere.
HeadquartersThe contact page lists headquarters at 415, Floor 4, Shaft-1, Tower-B, VRR Fortuna, Carmelaram, Janatha Colony, Bangalore, Karnataka, India - 560035.Koding’s about page lists its headquarters as San Francisco, California 94107.
LicenseThe public GitHub repository is marked AGPL-3.0.The repository states that it is licensed under GNU AGPL V3 and that Koding Community Edition is licensed under Apache 2.0.
Open sourceThe company says its controllers, CRDs, CLI, and workspace images are open source under the MIT license.The product site describes Koding as free and open source, and its GitHub repository is archived and read-only.
ProductKloudlite is a cloud development environment platform that connects cloud-based workspaces to application services so developers can test code changes without waiting for builds or deployments.Koding lets organizations create and share automated development environments on their own infrastructure.

Kloudlite plans

  • Free (Self-Hosted)Free
  • Control Plane$29 a month
  • Control Plane (Cloud)$29 a month
  • Cloud Tier 1$29 a month
  • Tier 1 (Cloud)$29 a month
  • Cloud Tier 2$49 a month

Koding plans

No prices published.

Pick Kloudlite if…

Kloudlite suits developers who want workspaces connected to application dependencies for testing code changes. It offers self-hosted and cloud choices, with IDE and AI coding tool options listed.

Pick Koding if…

Koding may suit organizations that want shared development environments on their own infrastructure and developers who prefer their existing local tools. The archived, read-only repository is important for teams considering its open-source status.

Charts they share