EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

JetStream DR vs Veeam Recovery Orchestrator

JetStream DR logo

JetStream DR

6.7#4 in disaster recovery orchestration software
WebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
Visit

What both publish

FactJetStream DRVeeam Recovery Orchestrator
Company sizeLinkedIn lists JetStream Software at 11–50 employees.Veeam's company page describes its workforce as more than 7,000 employees.
DeploymentJetStream DR for AVS is obtained through Azure Marketplace, while on-premises installations use an OVA package obtained from JetStream support.Orchestrator is installed on a 64-bit Windows Server and its web UI is accessed through a browser.
FoundedLinkedIn and the company site identify 2016 as the founding year.2006
HeadquartersSan Jose, California, United StatesG2's Veeam seller profile lists Kirkland, Washington as the headquarters location.
PurposeJetStream DR provides continuous data protection and disaster recovery for VMware workloads.Veeam Recovery Orchestrator coordinates recovery processes and provides one-click recovery plans for critical applications, with documentation and testing features.
SecurityThe administrator guide says management and appliance communications use HTTPS REST calls and trusted certificates, and SSH keys are passphrase protected.Veeam recommends enabling multifactor authentication for the web UI, restricting internet inbound connections, and limiting outbound HTTPS connections to specified Veeam and Microsoft update sources.

JetStream DR plans

  • JetStream DR for AVS—
  • Paid subscriptionPriced on request

Veeam Recovery Orchestrator plans

  • Evaluation licenseFree
  • NFR licenseFree
  • Perpetual license—
  • Rental licensePriced on request
  • Subscription license—
  • Veeam Recovery Orchestrator (licensed through Veeam Data Platform)Priced on request

Pick JetStream DR if…

You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.

Pick Veeam Recovery Orchestrator if…

It suits organizations coordinating and testing recovery for supported virtual and physical Windows workloads. Teams should account for its license requirements and Windows Server deployment.

Charts they share