Jekyll
8.1#2 in static site generatorsFree planFree planWebLinuxmacOSSelf-hosted
VisitJekyll vs Lume
What both publish
| Fact | Jekyll | Lume |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Because output is static, Jekyll sites can be deployed manually, through automation or with third-party hosting. | The documentation describes deployment through GitHub Pages, GitLab Pages, Codeberg Pages, Deno Deploy, Netlify, Vercel, Cloudflare Pages, and other hosts. |
| Plugins | A plugin system with hooks lets users generate custom content and extend the build process without modifying Jekyll itself. | Lume has a plugin system for adding features and format support, with default plugins including JSON, Markdown, modules, pagination, search, Vento, and YAML. |
| Security model | Jekyll supports a safe mode where plugins must be explicitly allowed through the whitelist setting. | The maker says Deno provides a permissions system and describes Lume's use of HTTPS imports as clean, fast, and secure. |
Jekyll plans
- JekyllFree
- Open-source JekyllFree
Lume plans
- LumeFree
Pick Jekyll if…
Jekyll suits people who want to generate static websites or blogs from text and layouts. It is also relevant to users comfortable installing its Ruby and build-tool requirements.
Pick Lume if…
Lume suits developers building static websites from repository-based content who are comfortable using Deno. It is less suited to projects that need interactive features without separate approaches or integrations.