Intruder vs OpenVAS
| Intruder | OpenVAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | Yes | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | €210.33/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, Linux, macOS, Web, Windows | api, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | hybrid | on_premises |
| Supported targets | external IP addresses, domains, subdomains, internal Windows/macOS/Linux devices, web applications, APIs, cloud environments, container images | network services, servers, applications, endpoints, container images |
| Authenticated scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Continuous scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Compliance frameworks | SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, Cyber Essentials | CIS Benchmarks, IT-Grundschutz |
| Asset limit | — | 150 assets |
Both are listed in Best Vulnerability Scanning Software, Best Network Vulnerability Scanners. On Everything Xiaomi, Intruder scores higher on our published basis.