Intave
7.3#1 in minecraft anti-cheat pluginsFrom €0.79 a monthFree planWebSelf-hosted
VisitIntave vs Medusa
What both publish
| Fact | Intave | Medusa |
|---|---|---|
| Configuration | Intave can use local settings.yml configuration or a named online configuration. | The maker describes in-game configuration tools, customizable detections, and a flexible command system. |
| Installation | Installation can use a bootstrap JAR placed in the server plugins folder, followed by token configuration and a restart. | The project listing instructs users to download the JAR and place it in the server's plugins folder, and cautions that reloading the plugin may cause problems. |
| Performance | Intave claims its workflow can run up to 50 times faster than equivalent game code and sustain thousands of players. | The maker says Medusa benchmarked 11.79 times lighter than a leading paid competitor at the time. |
Intave plans
- FreeFree
- Base€0.79 a month
- Enterprise€0.79 a month
Medusa plans
- FreeFree
Pick Intave if…
Intave suits administrators of Minecraft servers running Spigot who need server-side cheat detection. The free plan covers movement and combat detection, while Base and Enterprise add automation detection.
Pick Medusa if…
Medusa suits operators of compatible Spigot servers who need server-side detection without client mods. It is less suitable when newer versions, third-party engines or ongoing support are required.