IDmelon vs LiveEnsure
| IDmelon | LiveEnsure | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | — | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Android, api, extension, iOS, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows | Web, iOS, Android |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | hybrid | cloud |
| Supported factors | FIDO2 passkeys/security keys; smartphones; contactless cards and ID badges; NFC cards; fingerprints; Face ID/biometrics; SMS OTP; email OTP; phone-call verification | mobile device, location, geofence, time, knowledge, biometrics, behavior, gestures, Bluetooth devices, QR scan, tap, challenge/OTP |
| App integration methods | SAML 2.0; OIDC; REST API; existing identity-provider integration; custom SAML application integration | REST/API integration, iOS library, Android library, QR scan, app-to-app handoff |
| Adaptive access policies | Yes | — |
| Passwordless authentication | Yes | Yes |
| Device trust controls | Yes | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Multi-Factor Authentication Software. On Everything Xiaomi, IDmelon scores higher on our published basis.