Grype vs Xygeni
| Grype | Xygeni | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | api, extension, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Supported ecosystems | Alpine, Debian, Ubuntu, RHEL, SUSE, Amazon Linux, PyPI, npm, Maven, Go modules, Composer, NuGet, Pub, RubyGems, Crates, Swift, GitHub Actions, Bitnami, Conda, WordPress plugins | Maven, Gradle, npm, Yarn, Bower, .NET, Go, Python/Pip, PHP/Composer, Ruby, Dart/Flutter |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | self_hosted | hybrid |
| Reachability analysis | — | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | — | Yes |
| Monitored projects | — | 100 projects |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Xygeni scores higher on our published basis.