EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Grafana Loki vs VictoriaLogs

Grafana Loki

8.9#1 in log management softwareFrom $19 a month
Free planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
Visit

VictoriaLogs

7.1#38 in log management softwareFree plan
Free planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
Visit

What both publish

FactGrafana LokiVictoriaLogs
Deployment optionsself-hostedboth
Free planYesYes
IntegrationsOfficial documentation lists Grafana Alloy as the recommended collector and describes OpenTelemetry, Promtail, Fluent Bit, Fluentd, Vector, Logstash and other clients.The docs list Grafana, Perses, Bindplane, and Logchef integrations and describe ingestion from collectors including Vector and Fluent Bit.
LicenseGrafana states that Loki is released under the GNU Affero General Public License version 3.The single-node and cluster versions are available under the Apache License 2.0.
Live log tailingYesYes
Log pipelinesYesYes
PurposeLoki is a log aggregation system designed to store and query logs from applications and infrastructure.VictoriaLogs is an open-source database for logs designed for fast, efficient log storage and analysis.
Query languageLogQL lets users explore logs in Grafana or through the LogCLI command-line tool.LogsQL provides full-text search and log analytics capabilities.

Grafana Loki plans

  • Grafana Cloud Logs FreeFree
  • Grafana Loki OSS self-hostedFree
  • Loki (self-hosted)Free
  • Grafana Cloud Logs Pro$19 a month
  • Grafana Cloud Logs Enterprise—

VictoriaLogs plans

  • VictoriaLogs open sourceFree
  • VictoriaLogs EnterprisePriced on request

Pick Grafana Loki if…

Loki suits teams that need to aggregate and query application or infrastructure logs and can manage a self-hosted deployment or use Grafana Cloud Logs. Its label-based indexing and LogQL are central considerations for selecting it.

Pick VictoriaLogs if…

VictoriaLogs suits SRE, DevOps, and software engineering teams building logging platforms. Its single-node and cluster options support deployments sized to available resources.

Charts they share