Grafana Loki
8.9#1 in log management softwareFrom $19 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitGrafana Loki vs Mezmo
What both publish
| Fact | Grafana Loki | Mezmo |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment options | self-hosted | cloud |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Integrations | Official documentation lists Grafana Alloy as the recommended collector and describes OpenTelemetry, Promtail, Fluent Bit, Fluentd, Vector, Logstash and other clients. | Documented ingestion integrations include AWS CloudWatch, Docker, Fluent Bit, Fluentd, GitHub Events, Heroku Logs, OpenTelemetry Exporter, Vercel, and Vector. |
| Live log tailing | Yes | Yes |
| Log pipelines | Yes | Yes |
Grafana Loki plans
- Grafana Cloud Logs FreeFree
- Grafana Loki OSS self-hostedFree
- Loki (self-hosted)Free
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro$19 a month
- Grafana Cloud Logs Enterprise—
Mezmo plans
- Custom pricingPriced on request
Pick Grafana Loki if…
Loki suits teams that need to aggregate and query application or infrastructure logs and can manage a self-hosted deployment or use Grafana Cloud Logs. Its label-based indexing and LogQL are central considerations for selecting it.
Pick Mezmo if…
Mezmo suits platform engineering and SRE teams managing telemetry, alerts, incidents, and log pipelines. It fits organizations needing cloud deployment, configurable destinations, and an SRE agent that can run with their own tools and model choice.