Grafana Loki
8.9#1 in log management softwareFrom $19 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitGrafana Loki vs LogZilla
What both publish
| Fact | Grafana Loki | LogZilla |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment options | self-hosted | both |
| Integrations | Official documentation lists Grafana Alloy as the recommended collector and describes OpenTelemetry, Promtail, Fluent Bit, Fluentd, Vector, Logstash and other clients. | The maker lists 100+ pre-built integrations and names Cisco, Palo Alto, Fortinet, AWS, Azure, Kubernetes, Splunk, CrowdStrike, and ServiceNow. |
| Log pipelines | Yes | Yes |
Grafana Loki plans
- Grafana Cloud Logs FreeFree
- Grafana Loki OSS self-hostedFree
- Loki (self-hosted)Free
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro$19 a month
- Grafana Cloud Logs Enterprise—
LogZilla plans
- Starter$399 a month
- Pro$799 a month
- Business$1,499 a month
Pick Grafana Loki if…
Loki suits teams that need to aggregate and query application or infrastructure logs and can manage a self-hosted deployment or use Grafana Cloud Logs. Its label-based indexing and LogQL are central considerations for selecting it.
Pick LogZilla if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.