Grafana Loki
8.9#1 in log management softwareFrom $19 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitGrafana Loki vs groundcover
groundcover
7.7#15 in log management softwareFrom $30 a monthFree planWebLinuxSelf-hosted
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Grafana Loki | groundcover |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Integrations | Official documentation lists Grafana Alloy as the recommended collector and describes OpenTelemetry, Promtail, Fluent Bit, Fluentd, Vector, Logstash and other clients. | Listed integrations include Kubernetes, OpenTelemetry, Prometheus, AWS CloudWatch, Google Cloud Monitoring, Azure, MongoDB Atlas, Redis Cloud, Datadog, and GitHub. |
Grafana Loki plans
- Grafana Cloud Logs FreeFree
- Grafana Loki OSS self-hostedFree
- Loki (self-hosted)Free
- Grafana Cloud Logs Pro$19 a month
- Grafana Cloud Logs Enterprise—
groundcover plans
- FreeFree
- Pro$30 a month
- Enterprise$35 a month
- On Premise$50 a month
Pick Grafana Loki if…
Loki suits teams that need to aggregate and query application or infrastructure logs and can manage a self-hosted deployment or use Grafana Cloud Logs. Its label-based indexing and LogQL are central considerations for selecting it.
Pick groundcover if…
groundcover suits teams monitoring production environments that need metrics, logs and traces. Its deployment options serve customers who want a backend in their own cloud or both backend and interface on their premises.