Gluster
5.8#17 in distributed file system softwareFree planFree planLinuxSelf-hosted
VisitGluster vs LucidLink
What both publish
| Fact | Gluster | LucidLink |
|---|---|---|
| Security | Gluster documentation includes an SSL guide and access-control-list administration guidance. | LucidLink says files are encrypted end to end using AES-256 and that customers control the keys under its zero-knowledge model. |
| Support | The project points users to consultancies for design, performance, and additional support; Red Hat says it does not support community versions. | The pricing page lists Slack community support for Starter, Standard support for Business, and Premium 24/7 support for Enterprise. |
Gluster plans
- GlusterFree
LucidLink plans
- Starter$7 a month
- Business—
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Gluster if…
Gluster may suit Linux and self-hosted teams that need distributed storage for data-intensive workloads. It is also described for on-premise, public-cloud, and hybrid deployments.
Pick LucidLink if…
LucidLink suits teams collaborating on large files, including people using supported creative and design tools. Its plans specify member and storage limits, so teams should check those against their needs.