Ghost Inspector
6.5#22 in synthetic monitoringFrom $109 a monthWebAPIExtension
VisitGhost Inspector vs Pingdom
What both publish
| Fact | Ghost Inspector | Pingdom |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | The site names GitHub Actions, Jenkins, and CircleCI integrations, and says tests can also be triggered through its REST API. | Native alert integrations named by Pingdom include Slack, VictorOps, Opsgenie and PagerDuty. |
| Intended users | The product is presented for QA testers, engineers, and product managers, including teams without dedicated QA engineers. | Pingdom describes use cases for digital marketers, web hosting providers, and web developers. |
| Security | Ghost Inspector says it is SOC 2 compliant across all plans, and Enterprise customers can request an audit report. | SolarWinds provides a security information page linked from Pingdom's site. |
| Support | The company says support is available to trial users and that it replies to every question the same day. | The site links to customer support and support tickets and lists a sales contact phone number. |
Ghost Inspector plans
- Starter$109 a month
- Growth$225 a month
- Large/Scale$449 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pingdom plans
- Real User Monitoring$16.50 a month
- Synthetic Monitoring$16.50 a month
- Real User Monitoring annual calculator$198 a year
- Synthetic Monitoring annual calculator$198 a year
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Ghost Inspector if…
It suits QA testers, engineers, and product managers, including teams without dedicated QA engineers. Browser-based teams needing scheduled checks and CI integrations may find its workflow relevant.
Pick Pingdom if…
Pingdom suits digital marketers, web developers, and hosting providers needing uptime, speed, transaction, or real-user monitoring. It also fits teams that need many alert channels and public status pages.