Gatsby
8.1#1 in static site generatorsFrom $9 a monthFree planWebAPISelf-hosted
VisitGatsby vs Hakyll
What both publish
| Fact | Gatsby | Hakyll |
|---|---|---|
| Content sources | api | markdown |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Incremental builds | Yes | The FAQ says a normal build is incremental, while changes to site.hs require recompiling the configuration and rebuilding. |
| Local preview server | Yes | Yes |
| Security | Gatsby says its security program is SOC 2 Type 2 certified for Security, Availability, and Confidentiality, and that it adheres to GDPR. | The project describes static sites as fast, secure, easy to deploy, and manageable using version control. |
| Support | Gatsby says anyone can open an issue and ask a question, and the project team will respond. | The maker points users to a Google discussion group and the #hakyll channel on Libera.Chat for questions. |
| Supported languages | JavaScript,Node.js | Haskell |
Gatsby plans
- Gatsby open sourceFree
- FreeFree
- Personal$9 a month
- Pro$20 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
- FreeFree
Hakyll plans
No prices published.
Pick Gatsby if…
Gatsby suits React developers building content-rich websites and choosing among static, deferred or server-side rendering. Its plugins and CMS integrations support a range of site types and content sources.
Pick Hakyll if…
Hakyll suits Haskell users building small-to-medium static sites or personal blogs. It is a fit for people comfortable configuring builds with Haskell and declarative rules.