FossID Workbench vs Socket
| FossID Workbench | Socket | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | $25/mo |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Web, Linux | api, extension, Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Web, Windows |
| Supported ecosystems | JavaScript (NPM, Bower, PNPM, Yarn), Java/Kotlin (Maven, Gradle, Ivy, Kotlin), Python (PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Hatch), Rust/Cargo, Dart/Flutter, PHP/Composer, Ruby/Bundler, Go, C/C++/Conan, CocoaPods/Swift, Yocto, Soong, Elixir, Haskell, .NET, SBT | JavaScript/TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Ruby, .NET, Scala, Kotlin, Rust, PHP, Swift, C/C++, Julia, Dart, Elixir/Erlang, GitHub Actions |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment options | hybrid | cloud |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Reachability analysis | — | Yes |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software, Best Dependency Management Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Socket scores higher on our published basis.