EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

FailZero vs Veeam Recovery Orchestrator

FailZero

6.3#11 in disaster recovery softwareFrom $149 a month
LinuxSelf-hosted
Visit

What both publish

FactFailZeroVeeam Recovery Orchestrator
IntegrationsListed technologies include Docker/Compose, Kubernetes basics, Helm, Ansible, PostgreSQL, MySQL/MariaDB, S3, Telegram and SMB/NFS.The documented architecture can connect NetApp and HPE storage systems, vCenter, SCVMM, Hyper-V and Azure Local clusters.
PurposeFailZero describes itself as an open-infrastructure disaster recovery service for files, databases, containers, and virtual machines.Veeam Recovery Orchestrator coordinates recovery processes and provides one-click recovery plans for critical applications, with documentation and testing features.
Recovery targetsThe homepage states typical container-stack recovery time of 15–30 minutes and critical-data recovery-point objectives of 15 minutes or less.Recovery locations support VMware, Microsoft Hyper-V, storage systems and Microsoft Azure; Orchestrator 13 can recover machines to Microsoft Azure IaaS as VMs.
SupportStarter includes email support and Pro includes priority support; Enterprise lists on-call service.Veeam offers email and phone technical support to customers on maintenance and during the official evaluation period.

FailZero plans

  • Starter$149 a month
  • Pro$399 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Veeam Recovery Orchestrator plans

  • Evaluation licenseFree
  • NFR licenseFree
  • Perpetual license—
  • Rental licensePriced on request
  • Subscription license—
  • Veeam Recovery Orchestrator (licensed through Veeam Data Platform)Priced on request

Pick FailZero if…

FailZero is intended for customers seeking recovery planning for files, databases, containers, virtual machines, or listed application stacks. The site highlights indie hosting providers and customizable blueprints for radio and streaming, social and web, hosting providers, and custom stacks.

Pick Veeam Recovery Orchestrator if…

It suits organizations coordinating and testing recovery for supported virtual and physical Windows workloads. Teams should account for its license requirements and Windows Server deployment.

Charts they share