Facets
6.3#13 in internal developer portals$799 usage-basedWebSelf-hosted
VisitFacets vs Skyhook
What both publish
| Fact | Facets | Skyhook |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | The site lists Terraform, Kubernetes, ArgoCD, Prometheus, Datadog, OpenTofu, Helm, Jenkins, Grafana, GitHub Actions, Vault, OPA, and Falco among tools that join the governed model. | Skyhook documents GitHub authentication and GitOps automation using ArgoCD, and offers Kubernetes addons including cert-manager and nginx-ingress. |
| Security controls | The feature page describes a central registry of approved reusable modules with version control and security compliance. | The Enterprise plan lists role-based access control and single sign-on. |
| Self-service | Developers can provision infrastructure on demand while platform teams set guardrails. | Developers can deploy from the CLI, API, or web UI, with preview environments, canary deployments, and auto-scaling. |
| Support | The SaaS plan includes standard support; the Enterprise plan includes 24 / 7 priority support and a dedicated success manager. | Premium includes 24/5 email and chat support, while Enterprise includes 24/7 support. |
Facets plans
- Pay-as-you-go$799 a month
- Custom ContractPriced on request
Skyhook plans
- FreeFree
- Premium$1 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Facets if…
Facets is aimed at platform teams standardizing and governing infrastructure, and developers who need self-service provisioning. It also addresses teams using AI coding agents that need access to production-ready infrastructure within platform-team guardrails.
Pick Skyhook if…
Skyhook suits development teams that want self-service Kubernetes deployments through a CLI, API, or web UI. It also fits DevOps teams needing control, visibility, cloud flexibility, and Kubernetes extensibility.