Exiphore
5.2#20 in ai deepfake detection toolsSelf-hosted
VisitExiphore vs FauxLens
What both publish
| Fact | Exiphore | FauxLens |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | The opened maker pages describe no named third-party integrations and state that there is no external API dependency in the examination path. | Documentation describes patterns for content moderation, Greenhouse or Lever ATS workflows, social platforms, WordPress, and Contentful. |
| Intended users | The maker identifies law-enforcement and security agencies, police units, forensic science laboratories, prosecution, financial crime and intelligence teams as intended users. | The about page says FauxLens is built for journalists, HR teams, researchers, and others who need to assess whether media is authentic. |
| Product | Exiphore is a forensic media authentication platform that examines video, images, audio, documents and text for signs of deepfake generation or manipulation. | FauxLens detects AI-generated and manipulated images and video, returning a verdict, confidence score, and forensic evidence. |
Exiphore plans
No prices published.
FauxLens plans
- FreeFree
- Starter$2.99, paid once
- Pro$9.99, paid once
- Max$19.99, paid once
- API Starter$99.99, paid once
- API Pro$349.99, paid once
Pick Exiphore if…
Exiphore is intended for law-enforcement and security agencies, police units, forensic laboratories, prosecution, financial-crime, and intelligence teams. It suits organisations requiring customer-hosted examination and examiner-signed results.
Pick FauxLens if…
It suits journalists, HR teams, researchers, and others assessing whether media may be authentic. Developers can use its API for integrations, subject to request limits and the informational nature of its verdicts.