EraseBG
7.7#20 in ai background removersFree planFree planAndroidiOSWebSelf-hosted
VisitEraseBG vs Pixelcut
What both publish
| Fact | EraseBG | Pixelcut |
|---|---|---|
| API access | No | Yes |
| Batch processing | Yes | Yes |
| Commercial use | Yes | Yes |
| Export formats | PNG,WebP,JPG | PNG; API additionally supports JPEG input,alpha mask,and foreground-plus-alpha-mask ZIP output |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Intended users | The site describes use cases including sellers and small shops, designers and marketers, and people who care about photo privacy. | Pixelcut describes its audience as sellers, creators, and brands, with product photography, e-commerce catalogs, ads, and social content among its use cases. |
EraseBG plans
- FreeFree
Pixelcut plans
- FreeFree
- Pro$8 a month
- Business$24 a month
- API credits$10 a month
- API EnterprisePriced on request
Pick EraseBG if…
EraseBG suits sellers, small shops, designers, and marketers who need to remove or replace image backgrounds. It may also suit people who prioritize keeping image processing on their own device.
Pick Pixelcut if…
Pixelcut suits sellers, creators, and brands making product photos, e-commerce catalogs, ads, or social content. Its batch processing and API may also suit users handling many images or integrating background removal into a workflow.