Emissary-ingress vs Kong Gateway
| Emissary-ingress | Kong Gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Free trial | No | Yes |
| Paid from | Free | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, self-hosted | api, Linux, self-hosted, Web |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment model | self-hosted | hybrid |
| Supported protocols | HTTP, HTTPS, HTTPPROXY, HTTPSPROXY, TCP, TLS, gRPC, HTTP/3 | REST, HTTP, Kafka, WebSockets, gRPC, GraphQL, UDP, TCP, TLS |
| Authentication methods | Basic authentication, external HTTP or gRPC authentication service, client certificate validation, mutual TLS | Basic Auth, HMAC, JWT, Key Auth, LDAP, mutual TLS, OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, SAML, Vault |
| Rate limiting | Yes | Yes |
| Request transformation | Yes | Yes |
| Monthly request limit | — | 1,000,000 requests/mo |
Both are listed in Best API Gateway Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Kong Gateway scores higher on our published basis.