Earthly
6.1#16 in container build toolsWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitEarthly vs Source-to-Image
Source-to-Image
7.2#2 in sampler softwareFree planFree planLinuxmacOSSelf-hostedWindows
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Earthly | Source-to-Image |
|---|---|---|
| How it works | Lunar collects structured metadata from source repositories and CI/CD pipelines, then evaluates it against policies organizations define. | It injects source code into a builder container image, lets the container prepare the source for execution, and produces a ready-to-run image. |
| Integrations | The integrations page lists 66 integrations, including collectors and catalogers for tools and software ecosystems. | The README documents use with Docker and gives examples using OpenShift, UBI, Ruby, and WildFly images. |
Earthly plans
No prices published.
Source-to-Image plans
- Source-to-ImageFree
Pick Earthly if…
Lunar suits engineering organizations that want to apply defined policies across code, pull requests, and deployments without wholesale CI pipeline rewrites. Teams that still need portable builds can also use Earthfiles, which Earthly says remains available.
Pick Source-to-Image if…
S2I suits developers who want a repeatable way to turn source into runnable container images, including workflows that build from Git without a Dockerfile. Teams can also use its builder-image scripts and supported incremental builds to customize that process.