DeviceFarmer
6.1#19 in device farm softwareAndroidWebAPILinux
VisitDeviceFarmer vs TestingBot
TestingBot
7.9#2 in device farm softwareFrom $20 a monthAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | DeviceFarmer | TestingBot |
|---|---|---|
| API | The project documents a REST API for reserving and releasing devices, with OAuth 2.0 authentication. | TestingBot provides a public REST API and webhooks for custom integrations. |
| Deployment | The README describes installation via NPM and provides a Docker container; it says Linux or BSD distributions should work for production. | The pricing FAQ says Enterprise supports private cloud and that on-premise deployments are not supported. |
| Integrations | The README lists Android Studio and Chrome remote debugging support, while its API documentation describes using the API with Appium. | Official integrations include Slack, Jira, GitHub and CI/CD systems such as GitHub Actions, Jenkins, CircleCI, GitLab CI, Bitbucket Pipelines, Travis CI, TeamCity and Azure DevOps. |
| Security | The README says internal process communication is insecure and unencrypted, devices are not fully reset between uses, and multiuser deployments may expose sensitive data. | TestingBot states that each test uses a single-use machine and wiped device, with infrastructure in European data centers and GDPR and CSA STAR claims. |
DeviceFarmer plans
No prices published.
TestingBot plans
- Live$20 a month
- Automated$50 a month
- Pay As You Go€60, paid once
- Automated Pro$90 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick DeviceFarmer if…
DeviceFarmer suits trusted teams that need to access, allocate, and test on real Android devices remotely. Its API and listed Appium support may suit teams building device-based testing workflows.
Pick TestingBot if…
TestingBot suits software teams that need browser and physical-device testing across automation frameworks, manual sessions, and CI workflows. Its free plan and trial may help teams evaluate those options.