Dethernety
7.2#1 in threat modeling softwareFree planFree planWebAPISelf-hosted
VisitDethernety vs ThreatForge
ThreatForge
6.3#7 in threat modeling softwareFree planFree planWebLinuxmacOSWindows
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Dethernety | ThreatForge |
|---|---|---|
| AI analysis | Analysis options include deterministic queries, single-agent AI acceleration, and multi-agent LangGraph workflows. | The app supports chatting with Claude or GPT about a threat model and can suggest threats, propose mitigations, and answer security questions; it uses BYOK. |
| Intended users | The maker describes the GUI for security teams and the CLI for DevOps teams, with the CLI supporting CI/CD automation and threat-model-as-code. | The maker positions Threat Forge as a developer-friendly alternative for teams seeking threat modeling without an enterprise procurement cycle. |
| License | The public repository is licensed GNU Affero General Public License version 3.0, AGPL-3.0-only. | The application is released under the Apache 2.0 license, with no freemium upsells or enterprise-only features. |
Dethernety plans
- Open SourceFree
- BYODtPriced on request
- BYODt Team — 5 or 20 seatsPriced on request
- EnterprisePriced on request
- Hosted SaaSPriced on request
ThreatForge plans
- Threat ForgeFree
Pick Dethernety if…
Dethernety suits security teams modeling system architecture and DevOps teams using threat-model-as-code or CI/CD automation. It is a fit for organizations prepared to host their own graph database and infrastructure.
Pick ThreatForge if…
ThreatForge suits developers and teams looking for threat modeling without an enterprise procurement cycle. It may fit users who want offline STRIDE rules and are comfortable providing their own API key for AI assistance.