EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Dentrix Ascend vs Practice-Web

Practice-Web

7.2#2 in dental charting softwareFrom $35 a month
AndroidiOSWebWindows
Visit

What both publish

FactDentrix AscendPractice-Web
HeadquartersAmerican Fork, Utah, United StatesEl Dorado Hills, California, United States
IntegrationsThe Henry Schein One API Exchange provides integrations with preferred vendors, custom development, and data access, with SOC 2 Type II compliance and OAuth 2.0 security.Named partners include DentalXChange, Global Payments, Patient Xpress, DocPay, DoseSpot, Dental Intelligence, TSI, and Flex.
PurposeDentrix Ascend is a cloud-based dental practice management system combining scheduling, billing, imaging, patient communication, and analytics.Practice-Web is a practice management solution designed for dentists, covering scheduling, charting, billing, and patient communication.
SecurityThe maker states that Dentrix Ascend uses SOC 2 Type II compliance, encrypted backups, and role-based access controls and meets HIPAA requirements.Security features include role-based user permissions, lock dates, and an audit trail that records user actions and related details.
SupportCustomer support includes a resource center, help topics, United States phone support, and an AI virtual assistant.Practice-Web describes support for installation, training, upgrades, adding computers, and expanding smart tools, with contact by phone or email.

Dentrix Ascend plans

  • Dentrix Ascend subscriptionPriced on request

Practice-Web plans

  • Mass Email Marketing$35 a month
  • iPad/ Android Tablet Patient Forms$65 a month
  • Online Patient Reviews$69 a month
  • Additional TrainingPriced on request
  • Auto and Two-Way Texting$90 a month
  • Online Scheduling$119 a month

Pick Dentrix Ascend if…

You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.

Pick Practice-Web if…

Practice-Web suits dental offices seeking an on-premises system for clinical charting, scheduling, billing, and patient communication. Offices considering the trial should account for its 30-patient entry limit and supported Windows requirements.

Charts they share