DejaCode
6.3#6 in open source license compliance softwareFrom $500 a monthWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitDejaCode vs SourceTrust
SourceTrust
6.7#4 in open source license compliance softwareFrom $299 a yearFree planWeb
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | DejaCode | SourceTrust |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2003 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Integrations | Documented platform integrations include GitHub, GitLab, Jira Cloud, SourceHut, and Forgejo, with REST API and webhook options for other services. | The site lists GitHub, GitLab, and Azure DevOps repository connections, plus lockfile and SBOM imports. |
| Inventory | It tracks open-source and third-party components across products and supports unlimited products, components, and packages in each plan. | It gathers direct and transitive dependencies from repositories, lockfiles, and SBOMs into one inventory. |
| Purpose | DejaCode is an enterprise application for automating open-source license compliance and software supply-chain integrity. | SourceTrust helps teams review third-party software licenses and publish a shareable license compliance page for products they ship. |
| Support | Team and Business plans list technical training and web and email support. | SourceTrust offers a live walkthrough and lists [email protected] for platform questions. |
DejaCode plans
- Team$500 a month
- Business$1,500 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
SourceTrust plans
- Open sourceFree
- Per project — monthly$29 a month
- Per project — yearly$299 a year
- Extra watched branch$550 a month
- Custom domain$49,499 a month
- Security monitoring—
Pick DejaCode if…
DejaCode suits legal and business managers responsible for open-source governance across multiple products and teams. It may also suit organizations that need SBOM history and license- or package-level policies.
Pick SourceTrust if…
SourceTrust suits teams that need to review dependencies and publish license compliance information for shipped products. Eligible public GitHub projects may qualify for its free publishing option; it is software tooling, not legal advice.