CVE Binary Tool vs OSS Review Toolkit
| CVE Binary Tool | OSS Review Toolkit | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Free trial | No | No |
| Paid from | — | Free |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | Linux, Windows | Linux, macOS, self-hosted, Windows |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Supported ecosystems | Dart (pubspec.lock); Go (go.mod); Java (pom.xml, JAR/WAR/EAR); JavaScript (package-lock.json, yarn.lock); OpenWrt opkg (.control); Perl (cpanfile); Python (requirements.txt, PKG-INFO, METADATA, .whl, .egg); Rust (Cargo.lock); Ruby (Gemfile.lock); R (renv.lock); Swift (Package.resolved); Windows PE (.pyd) | Bazel, Conan, Pub, Mix, Rebar3, Gleam, Go Modules, Stack, Gradle, Maven, Tycho, Bower, Bun, NPM, PNPM, Yarn, .NET, NuGet, Carthage, CocoaPods, Swift Package Manager, Composer, PIP, Pipenv, Poetry, Bundler, Cargo, SBT, SPDX, ORT Project, Unmanaged |
| SBOM generation | Yes | Yes |
| Pull request scanning | Yes | — |
| Deployment options | self_hosted | self_hosted |
Both are listed in Best Software Composition Analysis Software. On Everything Xiaomi, OSS Review Toolkit scores higher on our published basis.