Currents vs Nijam
| Currents | Nijam | |
|---|---|---|
| Free plan | No | No |
| Free trial | Yes | No |
| Paid from | $49/mo | — |
| Open source | No | No |
| Platforms | api, self-hosted, Web | Web |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Paid from | 49 /mo | 20 /mo |
| Supported frameworks | Playwright, Cypress, WebdriverIO, Jest, Vitest, Node.js Test Runner, JUnit-compatible frameworks | Playwright, pytest, Vitest |
| CI/CD integrations | GitHub Actions, GitLab, Jenkins, Azure DevOps, CircleCI, AWS CodeBuild, Bitbucket, NX | GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins, CircleCI, Azure Pipelines |
| Flaky-test detection | Yes | Yes |
| Failure analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Execution trend reports | Yes | Yes |
| Data retention | 90 days | 90 days |
| Self-hosted deployment | Yes | No |
Both are listed in Best Test Analytics Software. On Everything Xiaomi, Currents scores higher on our published basis.