Cubic
7.9#2 in code review softwareFrom $30 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitCubic vs Stage
What both publish
| Fact | Cubic | Stage |
|---|---|---|
| Code handling | cubic says reviews run in isolated containers and that AI processes the PR diff and only the context needed for the review. | The site says code is sent to model providers for analysis at review time and is not used to train models. |
| Integrations | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. | Stage connects with GitHub, and the Team plan includes a dedicated Slack channel. |
Cubic plans
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
Stage plans
- StarterFree
- Team$30 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Cubic if…
Cubic suits teams using GitHub that want automated pull-request reviews informed by codebase context and team rules. Its self-described language support and review workflows may also suit teams using coding agents or managing review policies.
Pick Stage if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.