Cubic
7.9#2 in code review softwareFrom $30 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitCubic vs Squire
What both publish
| Fact | Cubic | Squire |
|---|---|---|
| Code handling | cubic says reviews run in isolated containers and that AI processes the PR diff and only the context needed for the review. | Squire says it reads code to understand it, does not store it, and deletes it when its task is done. |
| Product | cubic provides AI code reviews for pull requests and scans codebases to find bugs and security issues. | Squire describes itself as an agentic code review and quality platform that writes pull request descriptions, reviews code, and learns how to best serve a team. |
Cubic plans
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
Squire plans
- Teams$20 a month
- Enterprise$50 a month
Pick Cubic if…
Cubic suits teams using GitHub that want automated pull-request reviews informed by codebase context and team rules. Its self-described language support and review workflows may also suit teams using coding agents or managing review policies.
Pick Squire if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.