Cubic
7.9#2 in code review softwareFrom $30 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitCubic vs Sourcery
What both publish
| Fact | Cubic | Sourcery |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. | GitHub, GitLab, GitHub Enterprise Server, self-hosted GitLab, VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, JetBrains, Jira |
| Language coverage | Cubic describes itself as language-agnostic and names JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Ruby, Java and C# among supported languages. | Sourcery says it reviews any programming or markup language recognized by GitHub, while skipping lockfiles and generated files. |
Cubic plans
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
Sourcery plans
- Open SourceFree
- Pro$12 a month
- Team$24 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Cubic if…
Cubic suits teams using GitHub that want automated pull-request reviews informed by codebase context and team rules. Its self-described language support and review workflows may also suit teams using coding agents or managing review policies.
Pick Sourcery if…
Sourcery may suit developers and teams seeking automated pull request reviews and security checks across supported Git hosts. Its IDE extension and deployment options also serve users who want code review within their development workflow.