Cubic
7.9#2 in code review softwareFrom $30 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitCubic vs RhodeCode Enterprise
RhodeCode Enterprise
8.3#1 in code review softwareFrom $75 a yearFree planWebAPILinuxSelf-hosted
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Cubic | RhodeCode Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. | Documented integrations include Jenkins, TeamCity, Travis CI, Jira, Redmine, Pivotal, Slack, webhooks and email. |
| Licence | FAUN categorizes Cubic as closed source; Cubic’s terms grant a revocable internal-use licence and prohibit copying, modification and reverse engineering. | Community Edition is GNU AGPLv3; Enterprise Edition is distributed under RhodeCode's commercial software licence. |
Cubic plans
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
RhodeCode Enterprise plans
- Community EditionFree
- RhodeCode CommunityFree
- RhodeCode Cloud$8 a month
- RhodeCode Enterprise$75 a year
- Enterprise Edition$75 a year
- Enterprise Cloud Starter$80 a month
Pick Cubic if…
Cubic suits teams using GitHub that want automated pull-request reviews informed by codebase context and team rules. Its self-described language support and review workflows may also suit teams using coding agents or managing review policies.
Pick RhodeCode Enterprise if…
It suits software teams managing repositories across Git, Mercurial, or Subversion, especially those seeking behind-the-firewall deployment and detailed access controls. The free Community edition may suit teams comfortable with community support.