Cubic
7.9#2 in code review softwareFrom $30 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitCubic vs Macroscope
Macroscope
6.2#27 in ai code review tools$0.01 one-timeWebAPI
VisitWhat both publish
| Fact | Cubic | Macroscope |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. | The Agent works in Slack, GitHub comments, API, and Macros, and lists Jira, Linear, BigQuery, PostHog, Amplitude, LaunchDarkly, Sentry, GCP logs, and MCP connectors as connected services. |
| Product | cubic provides AI code reviews for pull requests and scans codebases to find bugs and security issues. | Macroscope provides AI code review, commit intelligence, and an AI agent for engineering teams working on GitHub. |
Cubic plans
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
Macroscope plans
- Agent$0.01, paid once
- Code Review — Budget$0.03, paid once
- Status$0.05, paid once
- Code Review — Balanced$0.05, paid once
- Code Review — Precise$0.06, paid once
- Code Review — Ultra$0.20, paid once
Pick Cubic if…
Cubic suits teams using GitHub that want automated pull-request reviews informed by codebase context and team rules. Its self-described language support and review workflows may also suit teams using coding agents or managing review policies.
Pick Macroscope if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.