EVERYTHING XIAOMI
Get listed
Side by side

Cubic vs Ito

Cubic logo

Cubic

7.9#2 in code review softwareFrom $30 a month
Free planWebAPILinuxmacOS
Visit
Ito logo

Ito

6.8#18 in ai code review toolsFrom $40 a month
Free planWeb
Visit

What both publish

FactCubicIto
CompanyThe maker identifies itself as cubic and describes the company as backed by Y Combinator.Ito's privacy policy identifies Demox Labs, Inc. as the company that develops and operates Ito.ai.
IntegrationsOfficial integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows.Ito integrates with GitHub for repository access and pull request integration, and names OpenAI and Anthropic as AI test-generation services.
Productcubic provides AI code reviews for pull requests and scans codebases to find bugs and security issues.Ito runs execution-based behavioral tests on pull requests and posts QA reports with findings.

Cubic plans

  • StarterFree
  • Starter FreeFree
  • Team$30 a month
  • Team$40 a month
  • Pro$79 a month
  • Pro$99 a month

Ito plans

  • Open SourceFree
  • Pro$40 a month
  • EnterprisePriced on request

Pick Cubic if…

Cubic suits teams using GitHub that want automated pull-request reviews informed by codebase context and team rules. Its self-described language support and review workflows may also suit teams using coding agents or managing review policies.

Pick Ito if…

Ito suits teams using GitHub who want automated behavioral checks on web applications or APIs during pull requests. The free Open Source plan targets qualifying non-commercial MIT or Apache projects, while Pro and Enterprise serve other teams.

Charts they share