Cubic
7.9#2 in code review softwareFrom $30 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitCubic vs Greptile
What both publish
| Fact | Cubic | Greptile |
|---|---|---|
| CLI | The CLI installs with Cubic’s shell installer, supports local reviews and CI API-key authentication, and is documented for macOS, Linux and Windows. | The Greptile CLI supports browser login or API-key authentication, local branch reviews, JSON output, and self-hosted API and web base URLs. |
| Company profile | LinkedIn describes cubic as privately held, headquartered in the software-development sector and employing 2–10 people. | LinkedIn lists Greptile as privately held, founded in 2024, headquartered in San Francisco, and employing 11–50 people. |
| Integrations | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. | GitHub, GitLab, GitHub Enterprise, Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Devin, Jira, Linear |
| Product | cubic provides AI code reviews for pull requests and scans codebases to find bugs and security issues. | Greptile is an AI code review agent that automatically reviews pull requests with complete understanding of the codebase. |
Cubic plans
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
Greptile plans
- StarterFree
- Pro$30 a month
- EnterprisePriced on request
Pick Cubic if…
Cubic suits teams using GitHub that want automated pull-request reviews informed by codebase context and team rules. Its self-described language support and review workflows may also suit teams using coding agents or managing review policies.
Pick Greptile if…
Greptile suits individual developers and teams using supported code hosts who want automated pull-request reviews and suggested fixes. Self-hosting and model configuration options may suit organizations with those deployment needs.