Cubic
7.9#2 in code review softwareFrom $30 a monthFree planWebAPILinuxmacOS
VisitCubic vs gitStream
What both publish
| Fact | Cubic | gitStream |
|---|---|---|
| Code handling | cubic says reviews run in isolated containers and that AI processes the PR diff and only the context needed for the review. | LinearB says it uses Git metadata, immediately deletes shallow-cloned data after processing, and does not scan, analyze, or save code. |
| Integrations | Official integration documentation covers Linear, Jira, Asana and GitHub Issues, while the product also documents Notion, Confluence and Slack workflows. | The maker says gitStream connects with tools across version control, CI/CD, DevSecOps, and documentation workflows. |
| Review context | cubic checks pull requests against the full codebase and team rules, including changes that may break code elsewhere. | Contextual labels can show estimated review time and flag Jira information, missing tests, or deleted files. |
Cubic plans
- StarterFree
- Starter FreeFree
- Team$30 a month
- Team$40 a month
- Pro$79 a month
- Pro$99 a month
gitStream plans
- gitStream free accountFree
- LinearB Essentials (includes programmable workflows)$29
- LinearB Enterprise (includes Essentials features)$59
Pick Cubic if…
Cubic suits teams using GitHub that want automated pull-request reviews informed by codebase context and team rules. Its self-described language support and review workflows may also suit teams using coding agents or managing review policies.
Pick gitStream if…
gitStream suits development teams using GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket that want configurable pull-request automation and review assistance. Self-hosting is available for organizations that need that deployment option.