CrushFTP
8.4#3 in file transfer services$70 one-timeAndroidiOSWebAPI
VisitCrushFTP vs Plik
What both publish
| Fact | CrushFTP | Plik |
|---|---|---|
| Authentication | Official security material lists LDAP, RADIUS, SAML and OAuth authentication methods, plus MFA or OTP validation. | Authentication options include local accounts and providers such as Google, GitHub, OVH, and OpenID Connect. |
| Encryption | The product provides PGP encryption for data in transit and at rest and supports secure transfer protocols including SFTP and HTTPS. | Optional age end-to-end encryption runs client-side, so the server stores encrypted bytes and does not access the plaintext or passphrase. |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Integrations | Supported back ends and services include S3, Google Drive, Azure, Dropbox, Backblaze B2, OneDrive, SharePoint, Box, SMB and Hadoop. | The project lists a ShareX uploader, a .NET API client, and a Thunderbird add-on as third-party clients. |
CrushFTP plans
- Small Business$70, paid once
- Professional$100, paid once
- Enterprise 1$1,000, paid once
- Professional, site license$2,000, paid once
- Enterprise 2$2,500, paid once
- Enterprise 2 (10 install pack)$8,000, paid once
Plik plans
No prices published.
Pick CrushFTP if…
CrushFTP suits organizations that need a server for secure file transfers, web administration, and connections to cloud or other storage services. Enterprise capabilities are relevant to teams needing scheduled jobs, monitoring, or session replication.
Pick Plik if…
You want what its maker publishes above — check its page for the details.